By using religious identity to question Abdul El-Sayed's loyalty, Mike Rogers employs a rhetorical shortcut that threatens the legitimacy of the democratic process and the American Constitution.
By Adele Rutherford ·
In a final Senate debate, Mike Rogers distanced himself from Donald Trump's Canada tariffs, a pragmatic pivot that exposes Abdul El-Sayed's refusal to acknowledge political nuance.
By Dana Whitfield ·
In a debate defined by personal insults, Mike Rogers tried to pivot on trade policy, but his failure to account for household losses makes him the wrong choice.
By Dana Whitfield ·