Trump abandons Saudi Arabia to Houthi missiles to dodge midterms

By Tom Beckwith · Reporting from Washington · September 21, 2026

Refusing to back Riyadh against Houthi advances, Donald Trump leaves a key ally undefended and bets American midterms on a fragile militant ceasefire.

Interests first, capabilities second, statements last

Let us begin where any foreign service desk begins. We start not with Irish bombast or frantic readouts from Riyadh, but with the stark arithmetic of power. Nations have interests, not friendships. Credibility is spent in crises and earned in boring years. The Houthis seized a strategically important island in the Red Sea and advanced toward the Bab al-Mandeb Strait. This was no localized theatrical display. They exercised capabilities honed over a decade of conflict to assert control over a global chokepoint. According to CNN, Houthi escalation began in July. By Saturday, alerts sounded in Riyadh as missiles and drones targeted sensitive sites in the capital and an Aramco facility in Yanbu. This is the Yemeni Civil War in its direct, unsparing continuation. It remains a decade-long struggle for control of Yemen's coastlines and straits involving the same primary belligerents. Most escalation is miscalculation until proven otherwise.

Saudi Arabia cannot find security solely within its own borders. The existence on its borders of friendly states is the only basis for long-range security, as diplomatic memorandums have long affirmed. Yet Riyadh's capabilities have fallen short. Despite receiving US intelligence and targeting data support, Saudi Arabia has been unable to effectively stop the Houthis from taking key coastal towns in Yemen. Saudi-backed Yemeni government forces simply disintegrated as the Houthis punched through them. With low missile interceptor stocks, Riyadh has requested air defense support from France, Britain, Pakistan, and Egypt. Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman spoke twice with Trump last week to request US strikes. The White House slammed the door. The professionals in the room usually saw it coming, but political panic overruled them.

The illusion of a ceasefire in an existential war

The opposing argument insists that statecraft requires pragmatism. Proponents argue that maintaining a localized ceasefire with the Houthis preserves American blood and treasure while securing commercial passage. David Schenker, a fellow at the Washington Institute, notes that Trump does not want to start another campaign before the midterms. He adds that the US is short of munitions and already stretched, while the war with Iran exposed the vulnerabilities of Gulf partners. As MS NOW reports, American diplomats met with Houthi representatives at the US Embassy in Oman to reaffirm a ceasefire. A senior Houthi official gloated that the Americans sent a message refusing to join the Saudis.

This view mistakes tactical evasion for strategy. Former diplomat Barbara Leaf observed that appearing to privilege an agreement with a Foreign Terrorist Organization is a harsh way to treat a close partner. The Houthis maintain a deep and productive relationship with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. That relationship has trained them into a devastating force. Trusting a militant group’s assurance that they "don't want to fight with us" while they rain ballistic missiles down on Riyadh and Yanbu is not diplomacy. It is an abdication. By taking the US out of the equation, the administration has left Riyadh negotiating with a gun to its head. This signals to every capital from Beijing to Tehran that America's word depends on the domestic electoral calendar. The current administration attempts to outsource the heavy lifting of security while washing its hands of the tactical reality on the ground.

The five-year price of outsourcing deterrence

To understand where this leads, one must trace the cost five years out. As Egypt Independent and MS NOW report, Trump told Fox News he was in deciding mode. Houthi attacks had threatened oil export routes and domestic midterms. Cutting deals in Oman while abandoning Riyadh to bear the kinetic brunt of proxies guarantees that Gulf security architecture will fracture. When a superpower removes its deterrent shadow, allies diversify their dependencies and seek accommodations elsewhere. The $24.3 billion proposed F-35 fighter deal for Saudi Arabia sits in congressional review. It is shadowed by deep concerns over Chinese technological infiltration and Israeli security edges, while the broader regional framework unravels.

President Donald Trump stated in Ireland that the Houthis "don't want to fight with us" and "we'll get that straightened out." That is the language of a real estate transaction, not a foreign policy. The professionals understand that when deterrence is traded for a fragile truce, the bill always comes due with interest. The United States has spent decades building alliances in the Gulf as a bulwark against regional hegemony. By treating those commitments as inconvenient noise before a midterm election, the administration weakens America's word in foreign capitals when the first missile clears the horizon.

Trump abandons Saudi Arabia to Houthi missiles to dodge midterms

Interests first, capabilities second, statements last

The illusion of a ceasefire in an existential war

The five-year price of outsourcing deterrence

Sources