Ben-Gvir calls for nightly killing and mass emigration of Palestinians

By Grant Colby · August 17, 2026

The architecture of modern governance, no matter how flawed or overreaching, rests on one foundational pillar: that human life possesses intrinsic value.

When State Power Becomes a Death Wish

The architecture of modern governance, no matter how flawed or overreaching, rests on one foundational pillar: that human life possesses intrinsic value. It is the bedrock principle that separates organized society from mere tribal violence. Yet, what has been aired from within Israel’s highest echelons suggests not merely a temporary lapse in judgment, but a deliberate abandonment of this standard.

Itamar Ben Gvir, the ultra-right Israeli Minister of National Security, made statements—repeated and explicit—calling for systematic nightly killings of Palestinians in Gaza. According to reports compiled by El País and La Jornada, Ben Gvir advocated that "every day we should carry out selective assassinations in Gaza, about 30 or 40 every night." He did not stop there; he declared that the targets included those who posed no immediate threat, adding the chilling assessment that some people are simply "not worthy of life." Furthermore, his rhetoric expanded to advocating for mass emigration—a process described by international law experts as nothing less than ethnic cleansing.

The Price of Unchecked Rhetoric

The sheer moral bankruptcy of this talk was immediately seized upon by regional actors. Khalaf Ahmad al-Habtoor, chairman of the UAE’s Al Habtoor Group, questioned the very notion of normalization with Israel after Ben Gvir's pronouncements. Speaking out on X, Al Habtoor sharply challenged the hypocrisy: "If an official in the Israeli government can speak this way openly, without shame or fear of accountability, how can we, at the same time, be asked to speak of peace, negotiations, and coexistence?" The UAE’s statement is not merely a diplomatic slight; it is a fundamental challenge to the legitimacy of state-sponsored brutality.

The most capable advocate for such rhetoric would argue that these calls are simply necessary measures in an existential fight for survival—that any means must be justified by the threat faced. But this argument fails because it confuses military necessity with moral license. History teaches us that when a government begins to define entire populations as "not deserving of life," the law has already failed, and civilization is at risk.

The Echoes of Genocide

This pattern—the rapid mobilization of state actors using pre-existing social divisions to target an entire civilian population—is not unique to Gaza. It echoes the mechanism that fueled the Rwandan genocide in 1994, where neighbors were mobilized by state forces to systematically exterminate a targeted group over a span of mere months. The shared mechanism is the same: dehumanization followed by organized violence. Ben Gvir’s public declaration that certain people "are not even human beings" is precisely the verbal trigger that precedes such atrocities.

The ledger books of history show this arc too clearly. When leaders prioritize ideological purity and vengeance over adherence to international law, they do not merely threaten instability; they initiate a descent into barbarism. The strength of a nation—the kind I have always believed in—is its commitment to the rule of law, even when facing overwhelming pressure.

The moment state officials treat entire populations as disposable numbers on a kill list, regardless of their threat level or right to existence, the promise of civilization dissolves. A government that cannot restrain its most radical voices and uphold basic human dignity has already forfeited its claim to moral authority.

Ben-Gvir calls for nightly killing and mass emigration of Palestinians

When State Power Becomes a Death Wish

The Price of Unchecked Rhetoric

The Echoes of Genocide

Sources