Hawaii records 140 mph wind gust as Hurricane Lala approaches

By Alma Cordero ·

The first thing you learn when you live in a border region—or any place where water moves through human life—is that nothing is ever truly clean.

When the river turns blood red with sediment

The first thing you learn when you live in a border region—or any place where water moves through human life—is that nothing is ever truly clean. The bay Jennifer Myers described to the BBC, now "like blood red right now because of all the sediment and river water," was never blue enough to begin with; it merely looked that way when things were calm. And this time, as Hurricane Lala bears down on Hawaii’s Big Island, we are witnessing exactly that: a massive natural force stripping away the veneer of normalcy until the foundational rot is visible.

The reporting from multiple outlets—from Al Jazeera to G1 Globo, and even through the lens of the Times of India—paints a picture of overwhelming power. Lala has strengthened into a Category 1 hurricane, packing sustained winds of 75 mph (120 km/h). The National Hurricane Center issued a warning for Big Island, noting that while this is not the first storm to pass through Hawaii since 1992, it is the area's first direct hit in 155 years. Governor Josh Green warned residents of "life-threatening" conditions; NWS forecasts predicted up to 63 cm (25 inches) of rain at higher elevations—enough rainfall to trigger mudslides and downed power lines across a vast, vulnerable landscape.

The sheer scale of the disruption is staggering: nearly 37,000 customers lost electricity on Hawaii as of Saturday afternoon; local transport was suspended; Honolulu Mayor Rick Blangiardi urged everyone to finish preparations today. The infrastructure simply cannot handle this kind of sustained stress. It’s a perfect storm—ironically enough—of weather meeting systemic inadequacy.

The weight of the water and the failure of the land

The narrative presented by the media is one of preparation: "focusing on your Sheltering Plan," as Hawaii County's Civil Defense Agency advised, or Bobby Camara’s resigned mantra to “hunker down, cross my fingers.” But this focus on individual resilience—the ability of a homeowner to stockpile water and board up windows—is always the wrong place for it to land. It is an attempt to manage catastrophe at the level of the tenant when the problem belongs to the landlord, the contractor, or the policy maker who allowed the system to become so brittle in the first place.

The common thread running through the reports from Der Spiegel and Asharq Al-Awsat, alongside the historical context provided by the University of Hawaii’s atmospheric scientist, is vulnerability compounded by time. The Big Island was hit by a Category 3 hurricane back in 1871; it suffered another major blow in 1992. But what these reports fail to articulate—what they are too polite or too overwhelmed to mention—is that the human systems supporting this beautiful, fragile place have been allowed to degrade into a state of chronic precarity.

When you look at the pattern—the repeated cycle of extreme natural force meeting inadequate infrastructure and over-leveraged resources—you cannot help but see the ghost of history. This is not just bad weather; it is a profound exposure of systemic weakness, mirroring the devastation of the Dust Bowl. The Dust Bowl was not simply caused by drought; it was caused by the failure to apply sustainable methods when the land itself became over-exploited and vulnerable.

When the soil gives way, no amount of planning can hold it back

The mechanism is identical: a long-term vulnerability—whether ecological or infrastructural—is catastrophically exposed by an extreme force. The Big Island's steep volcanic slopes, its reliance on complex power grids, and its fragile local economy are all built upon foundations that have been stressed for decades, if not centuries. When the rains come, they do not just fall; they act as a solvent, dissolving the weak points in the system—the neglected transmission lines, the poorly drained hillside, the underfunded emergency response capacity.

We mistake natural disasters for acts of God, when they are often simply the most visible manifestation of human mismanagement and neglect. The storm does not create the mudslide; it merely reveals that the soil was already saturated with unsustainable practices. We treat these events as isolated incidents requiring temporary fixes—a new seawall here, a better evacuation route there—when what is required is a fundamental re-engineering of how we live in relation to our environment and each other.

The storm will pass, but the memory of this exposed fragility remains. The lesson isn't about building higher walls or stocking more canned goods; it’s about recognizing that the true danger lies not in the wind gusts or the surge, but in the collective failure to maintain a sustainable relationship with the land and with each other.

Sources

  1. BBC: Hawaii braces for potential first direct hit by a hurricane in 34 years
  2. Der Spiegel: Hurrikan »Lala« erreicht Hawaii
  3. Al Jazeera: Storm Lala strengthens into a Category 1 hurricane as it nears Hawaii
  4. Times of India: Why Hurricane Lala is a historic threat to Hawaii’s Big Island
  5. Asharq Al-Awsat: العاصفة «لالا» تشتد وتتحول إلى إعصار يضرب جزيرة هاواي الكبرى
  6. G1 Globo: Tempestade Lala se torna furacão e avança sobre o Havaí com ventos de 120 km/h