Former Square Enix Exec Says Disc-Free Games Will Lower Prices

By Klaus Berger · August 16, 2026

The current discourse surrounding the elimination of physical game discs—exemplified by Sony’s reported plan to cease manufacturing hard copies for new PlayStation titles…

The Illusion of Digital Liberation

The current discourse surrounding the elimination of physical game discs—exemplified by Sony’s reported plan to cease manufacturing hard copies for new PlayStation titles beginning in January 2028—is rife with what I consider economic magical thinking. We are told that this technological shift, as detailed by former Square Enix strategist Jacob Navok, will automatically trigger a cascade of lower prices across the entire digital ecosystem. The premise is simple: remove the physical constraint, and the market will self-correct downward. This narrative, repeated across reports from kotaku.com and gamersaur.com, suggests that because publishers will now be forced into "constant competition" on platforms like the PS Store, we will see a dynamic pricing structure akin to Steam, where AAA blockbusters routinely shave off twenty percent.

When Competition Actually Works

The actual mechanism Navok proposes is fundamentally flawed in its assumptions about market power. He argues that it is "competition between publishers... not competition between digital stores" that drives prices down. This distinction—that the publisher sets the price regardless of storefront rivalry—is crucial, yet consistently ignored by those who treat the PS Store like a pure marketplace. The reporting from tweaktown.com even highlights this structural point: Sony’s store operates more as a conduit than a price-setter.

The historical precedent for such an argument is not found in software sales cycles; it must be understood through commodity markets, specifically the Repeal of the Corn Laws. In 1846, the removal of artificial governmental trade barriers allowed global supply dynamics to dictate pricing, leading to a rapid and necessary downward correction in food costs. The mechanism shared here—the dismantling of an artificially maintained price floor—is what matters. It is not merely that discs are gone; it is that the physical media has historically represented a structural barrier to efficient market competition for game titles.

Pricing is Not Determined by Convenience

To equate the removal of plastic cartridges with the repeal of mercantilist tariffs is to mistake correlation for causation, and technological convenience for economic law. The assumption that digital-only existence will force publishers into an immediate, perpetual price war ignores the fundamental power structure: publishers retain pricing authority. While I concede that a full transition eliminates the used-game market—a loss in itself—the supposed resulting "spectrum of pricing" is far more dependent on regulatory and structural liberalization than it is on mere format change.

The true force driving downward pressure, as history shows, is the removal of artificial constraints that allow global supply to meet demand without undue tariffs or monopolies. The digital shift merely removes one type of physical constraint; it does not automatically introduce a self-regulating price mechanism where none was previously enforced by market forces alone.

Former Square Enix Exec Says Disc-Free Games Will Lower Prices

The Illusion of Digital Liberation

When Competition Actually Works

Pricing is Not Determined by Convenience

Sources